If there is anyone who agrees to this agenda, that person must be a stupid. The value of a product should be assessed according to the needs of the people who want to get it. At the same time, of course, the quality of the product should be evaluated.
If we take this perspective, we should consider the reason why it is so cheap. The answer should be very simple: few, if any, want it. There is no good thing if few people want to acquire it. Maybe it might be very fragile, not easy to handle, or we can get much better product at the same price.
Either way! The cheapest product is cheap in the real sense of the word. It is, therefore, illogical to conclude the cheapest product is the most economical, because if we get a cheap product, we have to maintain it to work in a proper way. If not, it would cost us much more money to mend it.
Running cost should not be considered light. Even though the price of the product is cheap, running cost costs us much, it would be stupid to have it.
That is the reason I cannot agree to this proposal.
But I am afraid, there are so many people who tend to consider the cheap thing and try to get such a thing first, the result of which would be miserable.
I strongly advise you all, if you want to purchase something, the cheapest thing is the least economical.
No comments:
Post a Comment